<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aurora M. Brown - Social Media Specialist &#187; Style &amp; Form</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.auroramae.com/category/style-form/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.auroramae.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Consulting and Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:03:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s Troublesome Tripe: Techno-babble</title>
		<link>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/22/todays-troublesome-tripe-techno-babble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/22/todays-troublesome-tripe-techno-babble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 06:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aurora</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style & Form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing for websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auroramae.com/blog/2006/05/22/todays-troublesome-tripe-techno-babble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad technical writing. It screams at you from every proprietary page of a comprehensive, network-enabled, specializedÂ technology and advanced application company&#8217;s website&#8230;
What?
Welcome to the land of techno-babble.Â Fraught with pitfalls, sinkholes and swamps, it is a land where heavyÂ paragraphs drag you down; sentences trip you up;Â your eyes glazeÂ over strangeÂ words; and service pages provideÂ hazy &#8220;solutions.&#8221;
Sadly, manyÂ people get lost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad technical writing. It screams at you from every proprietary page of a comprehensive, network-enabled, specializedÂ technology and advanced application company&#8217;s website&#8230;</p>
<p><em>What</em>?</p>
<p>Welcome to the land of techno-babble.Â Fraught with pitfalls, sinkholes and swamps, it is a land where heavyÂ paragraphs drag you down; sentences trip you up;Â your eyes glazeÂ over strangeÂ words; and service pages provideÂ hazy &#8220;solutions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sadly, manyÂ people get lost in this land and don&#8217;t know where to go or what to do. Give them what they really want and lead them out of confusion; tell them what you do in bold, powerful language that is simple and effective.</p>
<p>Above all else, good technical writingÂ must be <em>accessible.Â </em>Visitors should leave your site as customers, with a clear understanding ofÂ <em>what</em> your product or service <em>does</em> and what it will do for <em>them</em>.</p>
<p>Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/22/todays-troublesome-tripe-techno-babble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave the Suffix -ize Alone</title>
		<link>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/16/leave-the-suffix-ize-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/16/leave-the-suffix-ize-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 06:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aurora</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Common Mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style & Form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auroramae.com/blog/2006/05/16/leave-the-suffix-ize-alone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A growing phenomenon in the world of words is the use of the suffix -ize. ThoughÂ it&#8217;sÂ acceptable toÂ summarize and harmonize in good taste, there&#8217;sÂ rarely, if ever,Â a reason to utilize or prioritize. Don&#8217;t smack -ize onto a noun to create a verb. ItÂ sounds worse and a better word always exists.
The word utilize is especially annoying. Use works [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A growing phenomenon in the world of words is the use of the suffix -ize. ThoughÂ it&#8217;sÂ acceptable toÂ summarize and harmonize in good taste, there&#8217;sÂ rarely, if ever,Â a reason to utilize or prioritize. Don&#8217;t smack -ize onto a noun to create a verb. ItÂ sounds worse and a better word always exists.</p>
<p>The word utilize is especially annoying. Use works as well or better, and it doesn&#8217;t convey the same coldness and sterility that characterizes the term &#8216;utilize.&#8217; The same goes for words like prioritize and finalize.</p>
<p>Using the -ize suffix to create a verbÂ immediately separates the viewer from your language. No longer is it intriguing and interestiing, but dull and hollow.Â  There are some words like harmonize and summarize that can be used sparingly, butÂ please, never, ever containerize!</p>
<p>Â </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/16/leave-the-suffix-ize-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Public Domain Resources to Find Free Books, Free Style Guides, Free Dictionaries, and More!</title>
		<link>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/15/using-public-domain-resources-to-find-free-books-free-style-guides-free-dictionaries-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/15/using-public-domain-resources-to-find-free-books-free-style-guides-free-dictionaries-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 01:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aurora</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar & Spelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style & Form]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auroramae.com/blog/2006/05/15/using-public-domain-resources-to-find-free-books-free-style-guides-free-dictionaries-and-more/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Find Resources at websites like Project Gutenberg and Bartelby&#8217;s.com.
Public Domain webisites like Project Gutenberg and Bartleby.com are gold mines if you&#8217;re looking for free literature or verse, style and grammar guides, and more.Â  They provide a plethora of work pre-1920&#8217;s, and its all free for you to devour at your pleasure.
Project Gutenberg offers 18,000 books [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Find Resources at websites like Project Gutenberg and Bartelby&#8217;s.com.</em></p>
<p>Public Domain webisites like <a target="_blank" title="Project Gutenberg" href="http://www.gutenberg.org/">Project Gutenberg</a> and <a title="Bartleby.com" href="http://www.bartleby.com/">Bartleby.com</a> are gold mines if you&#8217;re looking for free literature or verse, style and grammar guides, and more.Â  They provide a plethora of work pre-1920&#8217;s, and its all free for you to devour at your pleasure.</p>
<p>Project Gutenberg offers 18,000 books online. These include everything from books by Ovid and Dante to Jane Austen, Mark Twain, and numerous other authors. They are an excellent resource, and all the books can be downloaded as e-books.</p>
<p>Bartleby.com is an open resource, Public Domain site that offers numerous writing and grammar resources, including the American Heritage Dictionary, Strunk &#038; White,Â  Bartlett&#8217;s Familiar Quotations, and even Gray&#8217;s Anatomy. Their searches are divided into reference, verse, fiction, and non-fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/15/using-public-domain-resources-to-find-free-books-free-style-guides-free-dictionaries-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Killing the Fluff</title>
		<link>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/10/killing-the-fluff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/10/killing-the-fluff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aurora</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Common Mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style & Form]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auroramae.com/blog/2006/05/10/killing-the-fluff/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A common disease that plagues most writing, â€œfluffâ€ refers to using many words to say little or nothing at all.  It is also referred to as &#8220;filler.&#8221;
Fluff is found in a lot of writing, and is especially rampant on the internet. Take a minute and read any random article, piece of copy, or content [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common disease that plagues most writing, â€œfluffâ€ refers to using many words to say little or nothing at all.  It is also referred to as &#8220;filler.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fluff is found in a lot of writing, and is especially rampant on the internet. Take a minute and read any random article, piece of copy, or content and youâ€™ll probably notice that half the stuff youâ€™re reading doesnâ€™t actually say anything. Kind of like this post.  Annoying, huh?</p>
<p>A three hundred word article packed with good information is better than a five hundred word article that pads the information, or lack thereof, in a bunch of useless rubbish. It is about quality over quantity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/10/killing-the-fluff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did you say?</title>
		<link>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/10/what-did-you-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/10/what-did-you-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aurora</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Common Mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Style & Form]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auroramae.com/blog/2006/05/10/what-did-you-say/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Todayâ€™s topic centers on the use of overly complicated language. It is directed, of course towards the archaic musings of academic journals and the elitist drivel of snobbish websites.
Using big words and complicated prose is unnecessary and potentially alienating to your readers. In the same vein, grandiose, mellifluous sentences and excess verbiage expounding on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todayâ€™s topic centers on the use of overly complicated language. It is directed, of course towards the archaic musings of academic journals and the elitist drivel of snobbish websites.</p>
<p>Using big words and complicated prose is unnecessary and potentially alienating to your readers. In the same vein, grandiose, mellifluous sentences and excess verbiage expounding on the merits of your indelibly unique product and the synergistic experience of using it are damaging to your writing and to your content.</p>
<p>This doesnâ€™t mean you canâ€™t be creative and descriptive.  Look at books like Jesusâ€™ Son or marketing geniuses like Seth Godin. Better yet, read the Clue Train Manifesto.</p>
<p>In short, avoid long words that are hard to read and harder to say. They donâ€™t make you sound more intelligent; on the contrary, they make you sound like youâ€™re trying too hard.</p>
<p>To recap: ensure your writing is clear, strong and concise. Writing that appears lofty, hokey, or over your readersâ€™ heads is sure to drive them away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auroramae.com/2006/05/10/what-did-you-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
